


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 |
Organizational
Background
Conflict Management Group was founded in 1984 by Professor Roger Fisher to place into
public practice an innovative approach to negotiation developed at
Harvard Law School. CMG retains a close working relationship
with the Harvard Negotiation Project and the Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law
School .
CMG draws on the experience, advice, and
support of the world's leading academic experts on negotiation,
including Professor Roger Fisher, Williston Professor of Law emeritus at Harvard
Law School and founder and director of the Harvard Negotiation
Project. Professor Fisher co-authored the seminal works, Getting
to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, Getting
Together: Building Relationships as We Negotiate and Beyond
Machiavelli.
Goals
- To provide
strategic assistance to help parties find new and constructive
options to resolve or manage their conflicts.
- To provide skills
training to organizations and communities to strengthen their
dispute resolution and problem-solving capacity.
- To develop and
disseminate cutting edge ideas in conflict management through an
ongoing interchange with theorists and
practitioners.
Programmatic
Offerings
STRATEGIC ASSISTANCE
Through various
forms of Strategic Assistance, CMG works with the parties, on an
unofficial and informal basis, to find new options for dealing with
a protracted problem or conflict, building or rebuilding key working
relationships, or improving channels of communication. CMG Strategic
Assistance draws on the following tools:
- Facilitated Joint Brainstorming. Working with the parties
together to improve the relationship, develop a better
understanding of the situation and of each other, and develop
creative yet realistic options for moving forward on issues of
substance and process. Examples: Ecuador-Peru (border dispute),
Georgia-South Ossetia (refugees, political status, other issues),
Canadian negotiations with First Nations (Northwest Territories),
Springfield, Massachusetts (dealing with racial tensions).
- Facilitated Dialogue. Working with the parties together to
improve communication on difficult and emotional issues. Examples:
The Hague Initiative (ethnic leaders and Russian Government),
Cyprus (policy and political leaders).
- Parallel Training and Advising. Separate but parallel training
sessions in negotiation, communication, and joint problem solving
with each party to a conflict. Advising sessions help parties
prepare for and conduct negotiations, design processes for joint
problem solving, and identify sources of substantive expertise.
Examples: South Africa (political leaders and negotiation teams
from the ANC and National Party Government), El Salvador (FMLN and
Government negotiators).
- Joint Training. Training the parties together in negotiation
and joint problem solving. Examples: Sudan (negotiation teams),
NATO-Warsaw Pact (diplomats), South Africa
(labor-management).
- Conflict Analysis. Fact-finding initiatives designed to
understand causes of the impasse and to explore options for
improving the situation. Examples: Sri Lanka, Colombia.
- Mediation. Providing advice and support for mediatory efforts
and, in select circumstances, serving as an intermediary between
the parties. Examples: numerous U.S. and Canadian
cases.
CAPACITY BUILDING
CMG works to improve
the ability of communities and organizations to negotiate
productively and manage conflict effectively. CMG has helped to
build capacity within governments, intergovernmental organizations,
and with grassroots or community-based organizations. Capacity
building projects typically involve one or more of the following
activities:
- Training of trainers, facilitators and mediators.
Helping organizations and community leaders develop skills to do
skills training or provide facilitation or mediation services to
help manage conflicts in their community or organization.
Examples: CMG has trained trainers and facilitators in communities
in the U.S., Cyprus, South Africa, former Soviet Union, Guatemala,
and for international organizations like the WHO, and OAU.
- Diagnostic study. Interviews and analysis aimed at
understanding how an organization or community currently deals
with conflict and negotiation, identification of areas for
improvement, and developing possible options and requirements for
a capacity building program.
- Development of customized curricula and trainers'
manuals. Working with an organization or community leaders
to develop training materials suited to the culture and
audience. Examples: developing a non-text based curriculum
incorporating the use of fables and stories for a group of
grassroots organizations in Burundi and locally produced curricula
in Burkina Faso and South Africa.
- Capacity building design. As a standard part of most
capacity building efforts, we work with organizations and clients
to develop a system to make effective use of any new conflict
management, facilitation or training capacity. Examples:
OSCE, OAU, WHO, and numerous communities.
These capacity-building services can be used toward several
different ends, including:
- Development of a conflict resolution training capacity within
an organization
- Training of trainers and negotiation curriculum development
for grassroots organizations
- Development of a conflict management team within an
organization
- Training of mediators or facilitators to deal with community
problems and disputes
THEORY-PRACTICE INTERCHANGE
Despite the growth in
the field of conflict resolution and its growing acceptance by
official actors, there is still a substantial gap between the worlds
of theory and practice in this field. Often, potentially
useful concepts are articulated in a form sufficient to withstand
academic critique, but are not accessible to practitioners.
Conversely, some practitioners have developed innovative and useful
techniques that go beyond what is currently contemplated in the
academic literature. Given the right conditions, theory and
practice can inform and strengthen each other, but currently such
conditions rarely exist.
CMG is uniquely positioned to provide a link between the worlds
of theory and practice as it relates to conflict management. CMG has
honed its ability to make theory relevant to practitioners through
its work in a variety of cultures on six continents and with diverse
audiences such as teen gang members in Boston, senior diplomats and
government officials, indigenous people in northern Canada, and CEOs
and executives from major businesses. CMG also has the ability
to harvest sound theoretical concepts based on its work in the field
and with academic institutions.
Board of Directors
Ambassador Ivonne A-Baki Ecuadorian
Ambassador to U.S.
Joseph E. Anton President, Joseph E. Anton, Inc.
Landrum Bolling (Emeritus) Director at Large, Mercy
Corps
Scott Brown Former Dean, William Jewett
Tucker Foundation, Dartmouth College
Antonia Handler Chayes -Vice
Chair Senior Advisor, CMG Lecturer, JFK School
of Government
Roger Fisher Co-Founder, CMG Professor
Emeritus, Harvard Law School
Mark Fuller President, Monitor Company
Mark Gordon -
Chair President, CMI Vantage
Partners Co-Founder, CMG
Luisa Mendoza di Pulido Director, Eugenio
Mendoza Fundacion
Jim Sebenius Professor, Harvard Business
School
Philippe
Villers Founder,
Families USA
Foundation
|